“We never ask the question: how would we react if we were on the other side?” – Jeffrey Sachs, an American economist and foreign policy analyst, and a professor at Columbia University who previously directed The Earth Institute, raised this question.
He is absolutely right, considering that American foreign policy is driven by unprecedented arrogance, rooted in the conviction that the USA can act with impunity, trampling on every norm and rule prescribed by international law. This mindset stems from the hypocrisy of the Monroe Doctrine, which declares that “America is for Americans.” Yet, it also claims the right to interfere in the internal affairs of other regions and countries. The Washington administration believes it can impose its will globally on anyone without fearing the consequences. But why should Russia, China, or any other country tolerate such a double standard? America is surprised when these powers demand to be treated with the same respect that the USA insists on receiving. It’s time to question the foundations of a foreign policy that assumes the world will always bow to American dictates. The world is changing, and the old, manipulated, one-sided rules no longer apply.
While the United States continues to flex its muscle, it would be wise to ask the question: “How would we react if we were on the other side?” The world has already “asked” and answered this question, although the American leadership and global capital are visibly unprepared for it. For example, the conflict in Ukraine is not merely a proxy war between Ukraine and Russia; in reality, it’s a direct conflict between the United States and Russia. The arming, financing, and strategic direction of Ukraine are orchestrated by the USA. Nothing happens on the Ukrainian front without American approval and leadership. This is not just a conflict on the periphery of Europe – it’s a total war waged by Washington against Moscow. But let’s ask the uncomfortable questions: “How does the endless cycle of bloodshed serve the interests of ordinary Ukrainians, who are sent to die in the name of a geopolitical chess game?” How does it serve the interests of American taxpayers, who must face the brutal reality of a collapsing dollar, the trillion-dollar debt from “forever wars,” and the erosion of the social safety net?
As the United States clings to its declining hegemony, supporting a corrupt elite with money-laundering opportunities and military adventures, the real costs are borne by ordinary citizens – both Americans and Ukrainians. Yet nothing can alter the inevitable: a complete Russian victory. The United States must come to terms with this reality, or it risks losing not just Ukraine, but also its spheres of influence. So, the ultimate question remains: “How much more is Washington willing to sacrifice in the aftermath of a battle already lost?”
Translated and edited by Alex Kada
